Ryzen 7 7735H vs Ryzen 7 7840HS [13-Benchmark Showdown] (2024)

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption andphysics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 20% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10is an ancient ray tracingbenchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 19% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10usingall the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 36% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated toartificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 21% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less isbenchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 7 7840HS by 44% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads issupported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 42% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 41% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use moremodern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes calledSingle-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 13% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use moremodern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core versionloadsa singlethread with ray tracing torender a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 14% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that waswidely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It containsseveral embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measuresdata encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 40% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results aremeasured in kilobytesper second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 18% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2is a slowervariant of x264 video compression thatproduces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used whenit is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 42% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark usesMPEG 4 x264 compression methodto compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant thatproduces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file wereencoded per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 15% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Like

Like